Editing documents doesn't have to be a tedious and time-consuming process anymore. With the DocHub editing solution, it is now very easy to modify contracts, invoices, as well as other documents. The solution enables you to adjust your document to your needs. It supports multiple formats, including PDF, DOC, DOCX, XLS, XLSX, PPT, RTF, and TXT.
You can use online document editing tools to change almost any type of document with ease. You simply need to upload your document on the website and use the toolbar to make the necessary corrections. DocHub has all crucial editing tools enabling you to insert and erase text and pictures, add signature fields, annotate and highlight parts of the content, and more.
In order to send the edited document directly from the editor, you should click on the Share or send icon rather than Download / Export. Then you can select the suitable sharing method: via a link, an attachment, or a signature request.
Whether you want to Insert Text into Contracts or use other editing tools, DocHub is an ideal solution for modifying any document type. Create a DocHub account and benefit from our comprehensive editor.
the issue I have with skype and text messages is that you dont have a formal signature and generally when youre executing documents you want both parties to sign off so with an email it seems a bit more clear because you have an electronic signature so to say so to speak so my question is really how far can you go in terms of getting that through with text messages and skype that is an interesting question I dont think we have any authority that I could cite but this is not a question related only to one area now if I highlight the instruments act even that crimes acts in various states even the Commonwealth legislation Privacy Act will come into playing in this in this area so its not not just one particular piece of law judges will continue to make laws in the future in relation to this matter where specific laws are not there also to highlight this is not something completely new that 1954 case gives guidance if the part is Sam clearly intended to be bound there can be a contrac