Risk of Complications Using Laryngeal Mask Airway vs - TCU Harris 2025

Get Form
Risk of Complications Using Laryngeal Mask Airway vs - TCU Harris Preview on Page 1

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online
Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.
02. Sign it in a few clicks
Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.
03. Share your form with others
Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out Risk of Complications Using Laryngeal Mask Airway vs - TCU Harris with our platform

Form edit decoration
9.5
Ease of Setup
DocHub User Ratings on G2
9.0
Ease of Use
DocHub User Ratings on G2
  1. Click ‘Get Form’ to open it in the editor.
  2. Begin by reviewing the abstract section, which outlines the purpose and findings regarding the use of laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) versus endotracheal tubes (ETTs) in pediatric patients with upper respiratory infections.
  3. Fill out the Upper Respiratory Infection Screening Tool. Indicate any current symptoms or those experienced within the last four weeks by checking the appropriate boxes.
  4. Utilize the Management Algorithm for decision-making. Follow each question sequentially, leading to a recommendation based on your responses regarding whether to proceed with surgery or use an LMA.
  5. Review and finalize your entries. Ensure all fields are completed accurately before saving or sharing your document.

Start using our platform today for free to streamline your document editing and form completion!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.
Contact us
The advantages of LMA compared to tracheal intubation are no tracheal injury during tube installation and removal, less airway stimulation, less invasion of the airway tissue, easier installation, and efficient establishment (6-9).
The major disadvantage to LMA devices is that it does not protect the airway from aspiration. Given that most patients in the ED will have full stomachs, LMAs are considered only a temporizing measure until a definitive airway is secured (i.e cuffed ETT in trachea).
Laryngospasm, nausea, vomiting, arytenoid dislocation, vocal cord paralysis, sore throat, and cough were considered as complications of using LMA. The medical files of those patients undergoing surgery were evaluated and those cases operated on with LMA were identified.