Corrected List of January 10, 2012 to reflect proper entry date - courts state ny-2026

Get Form
Corrected List of January 10, 2012 to reflect proper entry date - courts state ny Preview on Page 1

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online
Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.
02. Sign it in a few clicks
Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.
03. Share your form with others
Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

Definition & Meaning

The "Corrected List of January 10, 2012 to reflect proper entry date - courts state ny" represents a revised compilation of court decisions from the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. This document includes significant rulings, with corrections made to entry dates for accurate legal referencing. The list encompasses various cases across different legal fields such as criminal law, family law, and civil litigation. Understanding this document is essential for legal professionals who require detailed case precedents and procedural outcomes.

Key Elements of the Corrected List

This corrected list contains several essential components that contribute to its legal and practical significance:

  • Case Summaries: Each entry includes a concise summary of the court's ruling, providing context and reasoning.
  • Legal Outcomes: Details the final decision, such as reversals, affirmations, or modifications of previous judgments.
  • Procedural Adjustments: Includes corrections to procedural missteps or omissions identified in earlier versions.
  • Entry Dates: Ensures accurate reflection of when decisions were formally entered, which is critical for legal timelines and procedural obligations.
  • Cross-References: Some entries may reference related cases or legal standards applied during rulings.

How to Use the Corrected List

Users of the corrected list, particularly legal practitioners, can utilize this document in several ways:

  1. Legal Research: Lawyers and law students can refer to specific cases for insights into rulings and legal reasoning, helping in formulating arguments and understanding court leanings.
  2. Case Comparison: Analyze outcomes and procedural details to draw parallels or distinctions with current cases under review.
  3. Court Filings: Ensure filings cite correct dates and procedural events to maintain compliance and accuracy in legal documentation.
  4. Data Input: Legal clerks and assistants may use these documents to enter case data into databases, ensuring all entries reflect correct information.

How to Obtain the Corrected List

Acquiring the corrected list can be achieved through several legal channels and resources:

  • State Court Websites: Check the official site of the New York State Courts or the specific Appellate Division for downloadable copies or online databases.
  • Legal Libraries: Many law libraries provide access to up-to-date court documents and lists, ensuring legal professionals can access the information they need.
  • Professional Subscriptions: Services like Westlaw or LexisNexis may offer the corrected list within their comprehensive legal research tools.

Why Correcting Entry Dates Matters

Entry date corrections in court documents play a vital role in the legal landscape for several reasons:

  • Legal Accuracy: Ensures all legal records reflect accurate timelines, which is crucial for appeals and other procedural requirements.
  • Case Integrity: Helps maintain the credibility and integrity of legal documents used in future cases or studies.
  • Compliance: Avoids confusion and potential challenges due to discrepancies in procedural deadlines or timelines that are legally enforceable.

State-Specific Rules

New York has specific rules and procedures concerning the dissemination and correction of legal documents, including:

  • Court Protocols: New York courts may have unique protocols for issuing corrections, often requiring formal notices or filings to amend records.
  • Publication Requirements: Corrections might need public notice or a specific format to be recognized officially.
  • Statutory Compliance: Amendments or corrections must comply with statutory mandates from the New York judiciary system.

Legal Use and Implications

The corrected list holds significant implications for various legal practices:

  • Precedential Value: Helps attorneys understand how corrections might affect the precedent established by earlier court rulings.
  • Procedural Compliance: Assists in ensuring all legal work adheres to guidance and directives from higher court rulings.
  • Argumentation: Facilitates the formulation of arguments in legal briefs or memos that rely on accurately recorded court decisions.

Examples of Using the Corrected List

Example scenarios illustrate the practical use of the corrected list in legal contexts:

  • Resentencing: A case involving drug law reform may rely on corrected entries to argue for resentencing under amended legal standards.
  • Child Support: Attorneys may leverage the corrected list when arguing for or against child support arrears, referencing past procedural benchmarks.
  • Malpractice Claims: Legal professionals might use prior rulings listed to substantiate malpractice claims or defenses in current proceedings.
be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.
Contact us
Rule 3212. Motion for summary judgment. (a) Time; kind of action. Any party may move for summary judgment in any action, after issue has been joined; provided however, that the court may set a date after which no such motion may be made, such date being no earlier than thirty days after the filing of the note of issue.
It is a remedy pursued by a Plaintiff seeking speedy judgment at an early stage without the delay and expense of a trial. Summary judgment may only be used as an extraordinary remedy by a Plaintiff for a claim that is based on a debt or liquidated demand.
Any party may move for summary judgment in any action, after issue has been joined; provided however, that the court may set a date after which no such motion may be made, such date being no earlier than thirty days after the filing of the note of issue.
The new rule allows a party to move for summary judgment at any time, even as early as the commencement of the action. If the motion seems premature both subdivision (c)(1) and Rule 6(b) allow the court to extend the time to respond. The rule does set a presumptive deadline at 30 days after the close of all discovery.
You should submit a request for court records directly to the Clerk of the Court or the County Clerk that possesses those records. Typically, the court in which the case was handled will have those records.

Security and compliance

At DocHub, your data security is our priority. We follow HIPAA, SOC2, GDPR, and other standards, so you can work on your documents with confidence.

Learn more
ccpa2
pci-dss
gdpr-compliance
hipaa
soc-compliance
be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form