Home
Forms Library
KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw

KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw 2025

KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw Preview on Page 1

Show details

4.3 out of 5

23 votes

The document is a Status Conference Statement for family law cases in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Cruz. It outlines the issues in dispute between parties, including custody, support, and property division. The form also addresses discovery status, co-parenting classes, mediation progress, trial readiness, and involvement of child support services. It aims to facilitate timely resolution of family law matters.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

The best way to edit KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw in PDF format online

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Handling paperwork with our comprehensive and user-friendly PDF editor is simple. Make the steps below to complete KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw online quickly and easily:

Sign in to your account. Log in with your credentials or register a free account to try the service before upgrading the subscription.
Upload a form. Drag and drop the file from your device or import it from other services, like Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, or an external link.
Edit KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw. Quickly add and highlight text, insert images, checkmarks, and symbols, drop new fillable fields, and rearrange or remove pages from your document.
Get the KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw accomplished. Download your updated document, export it to the cloud, print it from the editor, or share it with other participants via a Shareable link or as an email attachment.

Make the most of DocHub, one of the most easy-to-use editors to rapidly manage your paperwork online!

See more KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw versions

We've got more versions of the KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw form. Select the right KELLER v STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIAFindLaw version from the list and start editing it straight away!

Versions	Form popularity	Fillable & printable
2018	4.3 Satisfied (23 Votes)
2013	4.9 Satisfied (312 Votes)

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

Is the California State Bar a public entity?

Lawyers by state One-fourth of all the lawyers in the country are in just two states: New York (187,656 lawyers) and California (175,883 lawyers). Combined, they have 28% of the nations lawyers, ing to the 2024 ABA National Lawyer Population Survey. North Dakota has the fewest lawyers among the 50 states: 1,663.

What was the famous Supreme Court case called?

In a U.S. Supreme Court case Keller v. State Bar of California, the Court ruled that a bar association may not use mandatory member fees to support political or ideological activities that are not reasonably related to the regulation of the legal profession or improving the quality of legal services.

What was the Supreme Court case Keller?

Created by the state legislature in 1927, the State Bar is a public corporation within the judicial branch of government, serving as an arm of the California Supreme Court. All State Bar members are officers of the court.

What is the importance of the Supreme Courts decision in Reynolds v. Sims and Baker v. Carr?

The Supreme Court justices, however, sided with the baker in a 7-2 decision on June 4. Specifically, the justices said that some state commission members were hostile toward the bakers sincerely held religious beliefs, which violated their constitutional duty of religious neutrality.