Related links
                                                                
                            10-63 Maples v. Thomas (01/18/2012)
                            Jan 18, 2012 Though Maples was not a pro se petitioner on the record, he was, in fact, without authorized counsel. Page 26. 22. MAPLES v. THOMAS. Opinion of
                            Learn more
                         
                                            
                            PRO SE PACKAGE A SIMPLE GUIDE TO FILING A CIVIL 
                            The following instructions have been compiled to assist any person wishing to file a complaint in this court. We have attempted to simplify procedures;
                            Learn more
                         
                                            
                            Pro Se Litigants in the U.S. Supreme Court
                            by K Persaud 2024 26 Thus, it seems that, in cases where the pro se litigant was an attorney and the petitioner, the pro se litigants had a greater success rate
                            Learn more