Home
Forms Library
Dissent - State of Tennessee - tncourts

Dissent - State of Tennessee - tncourts 2026

Dissent - State of Tennessee - tncourts Preview on Page 1

See details

4 out of 5

50 votes

The document is a dissenting opinion from the Supreme Court of Tennessee regarding the case of State of Tennessee v. James David Moats. The dissent argues that the community caretaking doctrine should not be limited to consensual police-citizen encounters, as previously established in Tennessee case law. The dissenting justices believe that the community caretaking doctrine serves as an exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant and probable cause requirements, and they assert that Officer Bige's seizure of Mr. Moats was justified under this doctrine. They contend that prior decisions incorrectly restricted this doctrine and advocate for its broader application to allow police officers to act in their capacity as community caretakers.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out Dissent - State of Tennessee - tncourts with our platform

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Click ‘Get Form’ to open the Dissent - State of Tennessee document in the editor.
Begin by reviewing the introductory section, which outlines the case details. Familiarize yourself with the context to ensure accurate completion.
Proceed to fill in your name and any required personal information in the designated fields. Ensure all entries are clear and legible.
In the dissenting opinion section, articulate your reasoning clearly. Use bullet points or numbered lists for clarity if needed.
Review your entries for accuracy and completeness. Utilize our platform's editing tools to make any necessary adjustments before finalizing.
Once satisfied, save your document and choose to either print or share it directly from our platform for free.

Start using our platform today to streamline your document editing and signing process!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee and Baker v. Car?

The Court held each of the laws to be invalid on the grounds that the authority of states to regulate elections for Congress, granted by Article I, section 4 of the Constitution, did not include the ability to issue such regulations other than through the states standard legislative practice.

What is the rule 54 in the Tennessee Supreme Court?

(a) The courtroom of the trial judge to whom the case was originally assigned or another appropriate courtroom in the judicial district shall serve as the location for any in-person hearings before the special three-judge panel, unless otherwise directed by the Supreme Court.

What is the rule 26 in the Tennessee Supreme Court?

Under Rule 26 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, a party to litigation is permitted to obtain information such as depositions, questionnaires, documents, books and other relevant materials in the possession of an opposing party.