BOUMEDIENE v BUSH - Cornell Legal Information Institute 2025

Get Form
BOUMEDIENE v BUSH - Cornell Legal Information Institute Preview on Page 1

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online
Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.
02. Sign it in a few clicks
Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.
03. Share your form with others
Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out BOUMEDIENE v BUSH - Cornell Legal Information Institute with our platform

Form edit decoration
9.5
Ease of Setup
DocHub User Ratings on G2
9.0
Ease of Use
DocHub User Ratings on G2
  1. Click ‘Get Form’ to open the document in the editor.
  2. Review the introductory section, which outlines the case background and parties involved. This will help you understand the context of the document.
  3. Navigate to the sections detailing the legal arguments presented by both petitioners and respondents. Highlight key points that are relevant to your analysis or notes.
  4. Use text boxes to annotate your thoughts directly on the document. This feature allows for easy reference later.
  5. If you need to share your annotations or completed form, utilize the export function to save it as a PDF or share it via email directly from our platform.

Start using our platform today for free to streamline your document editing and enhance your workflow!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.
Contact us
The literal meaning of habeas corpus is you should have the body. Commonly referred to as the Great Writ, habeas corpus is most often associated with an action asserting ineffective assistance of counsel by petitioners challenging the legality of their conviction, but there are several other uses.
Boumediene v. Boumediene ruled that Guantanamo detainees were able to bring about a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in U.S courts and established that the judicial branch of government has the final say on unlawful detentions, rather than the Executive branch as the Bush administration had been implementing.
The high prerogative writ of habeas corpus is a speedy and effectual remedy to relieve persons from unlawful restraint. It secures the prisoner the right to have the cause of his detention to be examined and determined by the Court of Justice and have it ascertained whether he is held under lawful custody.
In Boumediene v. Bush (2008), the Supreme Court had ruled for the first time that Guantnamo detainees were entitled to submit habeas corpus petitions directly to federal judges in Washington to determine whether the U.S. government had enough evidence to justify their continued open-ended detention without charge.