Home
Forms Library
33557 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appellant) ) Cross Respondent, ) v

33557 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appellant) ) Cross Respondent, ) v 2026

33557 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appellant) ) Cross Respondent, ) v Preview on Page 1

See details

4 out of 5

33 votes

The document is a Supreme Court opinion regarding the appeal of Bonner County against a magistrate's decision that held the county responsible for the costs of commitment proceedings for an indigent individual, Daniel W. The court reversed the district court's ruling, reinstating the magistrate's determination that Daniel W. was indigent and that Bonner County should bear the costs. The opinion discusses statutory interpretation of Idaho Code sections related to mental health commitment and indigency, establishing that a bifurcated procedure for determining indigency and fixing responsibility for costs is required.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out 33557 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appellant) ) Cross Respondent, ) v with our platform

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Click ‘Get Form’ to open the document in the editor.
Begin by reviewing the case details at the top of the form. Ensure that all parties involved are correctly identified, including the Appellant and Intervenor-Respondent.
Fill in any required fields regarding the appeal specifics, such as docket number and relevant dates. This information is crucial for accurate processing.
Proceed to sections detailing arguments or claims. Use text boxes to articulate your points clearly, ensuring you reference applicable Idaho Code sections where necessary.
If signatures are required, utilize our platform’s signature feature to sign electronically. This ensures a legally binding submission without needing to print.
Once completed, review all entries for accuracy before saving or exporting your document directly from our platform.

Start using our platform today for free and streamline your document editing process!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

What is the difference between a petitioner and a respondent?

Appellee is the party against whom the appeal is filed and responds to and defends the appeal. The appellee is also referred to as the respondent . In contrast, the appellant is the party who appeals a lower court s judgment or order to a higher court.

What is the difference between Appellee and respondent?

The petitioner is the party who presents a petition to the court. On appeal, the petitioner is usually the party who lost in the lower court. This can be either the plaintiff or defendant from the court below, as either of the parties can present the case to a higher court for further proceedings. See also respondent .

Is the petitioner the appellant or Appellee?

If the case is appealed, as in this example, the name of the petitioner (appellant) is usually listed first, and the name of the respondent (appellee) is listed second. If the defendant in the trial court case brings an appeal, the defendants name may be listed first in the appellate case.

What is the difference between petitioner respondent and appellant Appellee?

Petitioner refers to the party who petitioned the Supreme Court to review the case. This party is variously known as the petitioner or the appellant. Respondent refers to the party being sued or tried and is also known as the appellee.