Home
Forms Library
Original - Court 1st copy - Judge Assignment clerk (green) 2nd copy - Respondent (blue) Approved, SC

Original - Court 1st copy - Judge Assignment clerk (green) 2nd copy - Respondent (blue) Approved, SC 2025

Original - Court 1st copy - Judge Assignment clerk (green) 2nd copy - Respondent (blue) Approved, SC Preview on Page 1

See details

4.6 out of 5

30 votes

The document is a legal petition for a personal protection order against a minor in the state of Michigan, specifically addressing cases of nondomestic sexual assault. It outlines the necessary information about the petitioner and respondent, the reasons for seeking the order, and requests specific prohibitions against the minor respondent to ensure the safety of the petitioner.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out Original - Court 1st copy - Judge Assignment clerk (green) 2nd copy - Respondent (blue) Approved, SC

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Click ‘Get Form’ to open it in the editor.
Begin by entering the petitioner's name and date of birth in section A. Ensure that you provide a reachable address and telephone number for the court.
In section B, input the case number and details of the respondent, including their name, address, and telephone number.
Proceed to section C where you will confirm if there are any other pending actions regarding the parties involved. Fill in any relevant case numbers.
In section D, specify your reasons for requesting a personal protection order. Clearly articulate your concerns and attach additional sheets if necessary.
Complete section E by signing and dating the petition to validate your request.
Finally, ensure that all copies are served as required in the proof of service section before submitting them to the court.

Start using our platform today to streamline your document editing and form completion process for free!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

What is the difference between a petitioner and a respondent Supreme Court case?

The petitioner argues first, then the respondent. If the petitioner reserves time for rebuttal, the petitioner speaks last. After the Court is seated, the Chief Justice acknowledges counsel for the petitioner, who already is standing at the podium.

Who argues first, petitioner or respondent?

The respondent who won in the trial court writes only one brief. The respondents brief argues that the trial courts decision was correct. Even if the trial court made a legal mistake, the respondents brief may argue that the mistake did not impact the judgment.

What does the respondent do in the Supreme Court?

In family law proceedings, the distinction between the petitioner and the respondent is clear. The petitioner is the individual who initiates the legal process. This could be someone filing for divorce, seeking child custody, or requesting spousal support. The action commences with the petitioners claims or requests.

What is the difference between a petitioner and a respondent in a Supreme Court case?

The next four variables identify the parties to the case. Petitioner refers to the party who petitioned the Supreme Court to review the case. This party is variously known as the petitioner or the appellant. Respondent refers to the party being sued or tried and is also known as the appellee.

What does granting cert mean?

On the face of it, the Supreme Courts Rule of Four is straightforward. Where the justices have discretion as to whether to hear an appeal, at least four of the Courts members must vote to grant a writ of certiorari, which facilitates a full review on the merits.