Arthur Andersens license revoked in Texas 2025

Get Form
Arthur Andersens license revoked in Texas Preview on Page 1

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online
Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.
02. Sign it in a few clicks
Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.
03. Share your form with others
Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out Arthur Andersens license revoked in Texas

Form edit decoration
9.5
Ease of Setup
DocHub User Ratings on G2
9.0
Ease of Use
DocHub User Ratings on G2
  1. Click ‘Get Form’ to open it in the editor.
  2. Begin by reviewing the introductory section, which outlines the context of the revocation. This will help you understand the significance of the document.
  3. Fill in your personal information in the designated fields, ensuring accuracy as this is crucial for any future correspondence regarding the revocation.
  4. In the next section, provide details about your relationship with Arthur Andersen, including any relevant dates and transactions that may pertain to your case.
  5. Review any additional notes or comments sections where you can express your thoughts or concerns regarding the revocation process.
  6. Once all fields are completed, utilize our platform’s signing feature to electronically sign the document, confirming its authenticity.

Start using our editor today for free to efficiently complete and manage your documents!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.
Contact us
The firm collapsed by mid-2002, as details of its questionable accounting practices for energy company Enron and telecommunications company WorldCom were revealed amid the two high-profile bankruptcies. The scandals were a factor in the enactment of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002. Arthur Andersen Co. U.S.
The conflict of interest identified between Enron and Arthur Andersen was Eron paying Andersen USD 1 million weekly, followed by paying consulting fees to Andersens spin- off firm (Bonaguro et al., 2002).
On June 15, 2002, Arthur Andersen was found guilty of shredding evidence and lost its license to engage in public accounting. Three years later, Andersen lawyers successfully persuaded the United States Supreme Court to unanimously overturn the obstruction of justice verdict on the basis of faulty jury instructions.
The Court held that contrary to the position of the Justice Department, the jury instructions failed to require a showing that Arthur Andersen had criminal intent to violate the law.
On June 15, 2002, the jury found Andersen guilty of obstruction of justice, the first accounting firm ever to be convicted of a felony. The company agreed to stop auditing public companies by August 31, 2002, essentially shutting down the business.