Matter of Cohen 2025

See details

4.5 out of 5

32 votes

The document is a court opinion regarding the contested probate of Robert Cohen's last will and testament. Beatrice Cohen, the decedent's wife, seeks to dismiss objections raised by Meryl Kovit, the decedent's daughter from a previous marriage, and to admit the will to probate. The court grants Beatrice's motion in part, dismissing claims of undue influence and fraud but denying summary judgment on the issue of due execution due to unresolved factual questions about the will's signing ceremony. A trial is scheduled to further examine these issues.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

The best way to modify Matter of Cohen online

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

With DocHub, making changes to your paperwork takes only a few simple clicks. Follow these quick steps to modify the PDF Matter of Cohen online for free:

Sign up and log in to your account. Sign in to the editor with your credentials or click on Create free account to test the tool’s capabilities.
Add the Matter of Cohen for redacting. Click the New Document option above, then drag and drop the sample to the upload area, import it from the cloud, or using a link.
Modify your template. Make any changes needed: add text and images to your Matter of Cohen, underline details that matter, remove sections of content and replace them with new ones, and add symbols, checkmarks, and areas for filling out.
Complete redacting the form. Save the modified document on your device, export it to the cloud, print it right from the editor, or share it with all the people involved.

Our editor is super intuitive and effective. Try it out now!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

What did the Court decide in the case of Cohen vs California?

Lastly, the states interest in protecting public morals was insufficient to justify the arrest, because sensitive people were free to avert their eyes. Ultimately, the Court struck down Cohens conviction, affirming the First Amendments protection of offensive expression.

What was the defendant in Stromberg v California charged with doing?

Facts of the case Yetta Stromberg was charged with violating a California law prohibiting displaying a red flag in a public meeting place after displaying a red flag daily at a childrens camp in the San Bernardino Mountains.

What was Mr Cohen charged with violating in Cohen v California?

Then, the police officer arrested Mr. Cohen in the courthouse lobby, charging him with violating a state bdocHub-of-the-peace law. Cohen said he challenged his conviction all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court because I didnt want to serve 30 days in jail.

Was Cohen v California overturned?

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned a mans conviction of disturbing the peace..byoffensive conduct. Paul Robert Cohen was arrested under the California Penal Code 415 for disturbing the peace after wearing a jacket that said the Draft in a municipal courthouse in California.

What was Mr Cohen charged with violating in N Cohen v California?

He was convicted of violating section 415 of the California Penal Code, which prohibited maliciously and willfully disturb[ing] the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or person [by] tumultuous or offensive conduct, and sentenced to 30 days in jail.