Do you want to avoid the challenges of editing Collateral Agreement online? You don’t have to worry about installing unreliable solutions or compromising your documents ever again. With DocHub, you can restore fee in Collateral Agreement without having to spend hours on it. And that’s not all; our user-friendly platform also offers you robust data collection tools for collecting signatures, information, and payments through fillable forms. You can build teams using our collaboration features and efficiently work together with multiple people on documents. Additionally, DocHub keeps your information safe and in compliance with industry-leading security standards.
DocHub enables you to use its tools regardless of your system. You can use it from your laptop, mobile device, or tablet and edit Collateral Agreement quickly. Start working smarter today with DocHub!
This week, Ive been looking at the case of Coleman v Mundell, which was handed down at the end of last month. The case was a dispute about an oral contract. The claimant, Mr C sought specific performance of the contract, which is an order compelling a party to comply with their contractual obligations. It is an equitable remedy and so it is only available at the courts discretion. The facts of this case may be summarised as follows. Mr C, the claimant, had a company which was suffering financial difficulties and he wanted to secure a cash injection into his business. He owned shares in a Spanish entity. The defendant Mr M was Mr Cs friend and also a businessman. Mr C and Mr M had a conversation on the 30th of September 2016. Mr C and Mr M each recalled that conversation differently. At trial, Mr C said that Mr M agreed to make an interest-free loan of 250,000 and that the loan would be secured on Mr Cs shares. Mr M recalled that Mr C had said that M