Working with papers means making minor corrections to them every day. Sometimes, the job goes nearly automatically, especially if it is part of your day-to-day routine. Nevertheless, in other cases, dealing with an unusual document like a Hedging Agreement can take precious working time just to carry out the research. To make sure that every operation with your papers is trouble-free and fast, you need to find an optimal editing solution for this kind of tasks.
With DocHub, you can see how it works without spending time to figure it all out. Your tools are laid out before your eyes and are readily available. This online solution will not need any sort of background - training or expertise - from its users. It is all set for work even when you are not familiar with software traditionally utilized to produce Hedging Agreement. Quickly create, edit, and send out documents, whether you deal with them daily or are opening a brand new document type for the first time. It takes minutes to find a way to work with Hedging Agreement.
With DocHub, there is no need to study different document types to figure out how to edit them. Have all the go-to tools for modifying papers close at hand to streamline your document management.
hello this is sylvia of cpd books and in this video i will be responding the question related to the hedge effectiveness prospective test versus retrospective test especially in the light of the rules in ifrs 9 because there was a change from is 39 a few years ago todays question comes from sumit from india but hes not the only one in fact many readers ask me the same thing which needs clarification so here we go under ifrs 9 we are required to test the hedge effectiveness prospectively and we can use the qualitative methods for example the critical terms matching does it mean that there is no need for quantitative retrospective testing of the hedge effectiveness here we are talking about cash flow h of forecast transaction and all the critical terms of hatched item and hedging instrument match and the h is designated at day one i believe that if all terms match then the hedge is a hundred percent effective always and there is no need for quantitative testing okay so thats the end