Get the up-to-date Unintended Consequences: Fundamental Flaws That Plague the No Child Left Behind Act 2024 now

Get Form
some critics of no child left behind argued that it was having the unintended consequence of Preview on Page 1

Here's how it works

01. Edit your some critics of the no child left behind act argued that it was having the unintended consequence of online
01. Edit your which of the following was an unintended consequence of the no child left behind act online
Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.
02. Sign it in a few clicks
02. Sign it in a few clicks
Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.
03. Share your form with others
03. Share your form with others
Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

The best way to modify Unintended Consequences: Fundamental Flaws That Plague the No Child Left Behind Act online

Form edit decoration
9.5
Ease of Setup
DocHub User Ratings on G2
9.0
Ease of Use
DocHub User Ratings on G2

With DocHub, making changes to your documentation takes just a few simple clicks. Follow these quick steps to modify the PDF Unintended Consequences: Fundamental Flaws That Plague the No Child Left Behind Act online for free:

  1. Sign up and log in to your account. Log in to the editor with your credentials or click Create free account to examine the tool’s features.
  2. Add the Unintended Consequences: Fundamental Flaws That Plague the No Child Left Behind Act for editing. Click on the New Document button above, then drag and drop the file to the upload area, import it from the cloud, or via a link.
  3. Adjust your template. Make any changes needed: add text and images to your Unintended Consequences: Fundamental Flaws That Plague the No Child Left Behind Act, underline details that matter, remove sections of content and substitute them with new ones, and insert icons, checkmarks, and areas for filling out.
  4. Complete redacting the template. Save the modified document on your device, export it to the cloud, print it right from the editor, or share it with all the people involved.

Our editor is super intuitive and effective. Try it now!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.
Contact us
Our results suggest that NCLB led to increases in teacher compensa- tion and the share of teachers with graduate degrees. We find evidence that NCLB shifted the allocation of instructional time toward math and reading, the subjects targeted by the new accountability systems.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was the main law for K\u201312 general education in the United States from 2002\u20132015. The law held schools accountable for how kids learned and achieved. The law was controversial in part because it penalized schools that didn't show improvement.
Our results suggest that NCLB led to increases in teacher compensa- tion and the share of teachers with graduate degrees. We find evidence that NCLB shifted the allocation of instructional time toward math and reading, the subjects targeted by the new accountability systems.
Nearly a decade and a half later, No Child Left Behind is often described as a failure, and there is no question that the law fell short of many of its most ambitious goals. Most schools didn't come close to achieving the 100-percent-proficiency mandate, which experts never considered a realistic target.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was the main law for K\u201312 general education in the United States from 2002\u20132015. The law held schools accountable for how kids learned and achieved. The law was controversial in part because it penalized schools that didn't show improvement.

People also ask

the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (PL 107-110). law reveals that eventually all pupils, including those in special education, are expected to demonstrate proficiency in mathematics, reading, and science.
Perhaps the most adverse unintended consequence of NCLB is that it creates incentives for schools to rid themselves of students who are not doing well, producing higher scores at the expense of vulnerable students' education.
Emphasis on Standardized Testing One recurring No Child Left Behind Act Criticism is that it forces teachers to "teach to the test" in order to get students to pass standardized tests. These critics say that a consequence of teaching to the test is that teacher creativity and student learning are stifled.
Our results suggest that NCLB led to increases in teacher compensa- tion and the share of teachers with graduate degrees. We find evidence that NCLB shifted the allocation of instructional time toward math and reading, the subjects targeted by the new accountability systems.
Which of the following is a criticism of No Child Left Behind? NCLB mandates changes but does not sufficiently find these changes.

Related links