Home
Forms Library
MWB-12-CR-4040 United States v Hayes Sentencing Matter 06072013docx - iand uscourts

MWB-12-CR-4040 United States v Hayes Sentencing Matter 06072013docx - iand uscourts-2025

MWB-12-CR-4040 United States v Hayes Sentencing Matter 06072013docx - iand uscourts Preview on Page 1

See details

4.4 out of 5

33 votes

The document is a Sentencing Opinion from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa regarding defendant Willie Hayes, who was convicted of methamphetamine-related offenses. The opinion discusses the court's policy disagreement with the existing U.S. Sentencing Guidelines for methamphetamine, arguing that they are excessively punitive and not based on empirical data. The judge outlines the flaws in the guidelines' creation and application, emphasizing that they fail to accurately reflect a defendant's culpability based on their role in drug trafficking. Ultimately, the court decides to vary from the guidelines by reducing Hayes's sentence to 75 months, citing a need for a more just approach to sentencing in such cases.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out MWB-12-CR-4040 United States v Hayes Sentencing Matter 06072013docx - iand uscourts with our platform

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Click ‘Get Form’ to open the document in the editor.
Begin by reviewing the introduction section, which outlines the indictment and guilty plea. Ensure you understand the context before filling out any fields.
Navigate to the 'Arguments of the Parties' section. Here, you may need to input specific arguments or positions relevant to your case. Use text boxes for clarity.
Proceed to the 'Legal Analysis' section. Fill in any required information regarding sentencing methodology and policy disagreements as applicable.
In the conclusion section, summarize your findings or decisions based on your analysis. This is crucial for clarity and completeness.
Once all sections are filled out, review your entries for accuracy. Utilize our platform's editing tools to make any necessary adjustments.
Finally, save your document and consider using our signing feature if required for submission.

Start using our platform today for free to streamline your document editing and completion process!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

What does the US Supreme Court case Branzburg v Hayes concern?

In Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), the Supreme Court ruled that freedom of press did not create a constitutional privilege protecting reporters from having to testify in grand jury proceedings about the identity of news sources or information received in confidence.

What is the Branzburg test?

The Supreme Court held in its 1972 decision in Branzburg v. Hayes that reporters had no privilege to refuse to appear and testify before state or federal grand juries.

What was unique about Justice Powells concurring opinion in Branzburg v. Hayes?

Of greatest significance was a concurring opinion by Justice Lewis Powell, who suggested reporters might still challenge grand jury subpoenas on a case-by-case basis, even if there were no formal reporters privilege.

What was the decision in US v Hayes?

Hayes, the Fourth Circuit agreed with Hayes argument, and ruled that the domestic relationship must indeed be a specific element of the prior offense in order to trigger the federal gun baneffectively rendering the gun ban moot in the states that do not have misdemeanor laws specific to domestic violence.

In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court uphold a conviction for expressing disloyalty and interfering with the war effort?

In June 1918, Title 1 of the Espionage Act was expanded to limit speech critical of the war with the passage of the Sedition Act of 1918. This new law led to similar convictions that were ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court in Debs v. United States (1919), Frohwerk v. United States (1919), and Abrams v.

What was the Hayes decision?

Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court invalidating the use of the First Amendment as a defense for reporters summoned to testify before a grand jury. The case was argued February 23, 1972, and decided June 29 of the same year. The reporters lost their case by a vote of 54.

MWB-12-CR-4040 United States v Hayes Sentencing Matter 06072013docx - iand uscourts-2025

Here's how it works