Home
Forms Library
June 2009 FDP Research Subaward Agreement Institution Organization ( andquot

June 2009 FDP Research Subaward Agreement Institution Organization ( andquot-2025

June 2009 FDP Research Subaward Agreement Institution Organization ( andquot Preview on Page 1

Show details

4.6 out of 5

63 votes

The document outlines a Research Subaward Agreement between the University of Alaska Fairbanks (Prime Recipient) and a Subrecipient, detailing terms and conditions for funding provided by the National Institutes of Health. It includes provisions for cost reimbursement, reporting requirements, certifications regarding lobbying and compliance, and responsibilities of both parties. The agreement emphasizes the independent status of the Subrecipient, invoicing procedures, termination clauses, and adherence to federal regulations.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to quickly redact June 2009 FDP Research Subaward Agreement Institution Organization ( andquot online

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Dochub is a perfect editor for modifying your paperwork online. Follow this simple guideline redact June 2009 FDP Research Subaward Agreement Institution Organization ( andquot in PDF format online free of charge:

Register and sign in. Create a free account, set a secure password, and proceed with email verification to start working on your templates.
Upload a document. Click on New Document and choose the form importing option: upload June 2009 FDP Research Subaward Agreement Institution Organization ( andquot from your device, the cloud, or a secure URL.
Make adjustments to the template. Utilize the upper and left-side panel tools to modify June 2009 FDP Research Subaward Agreement Institution Organization ( andquot. Add and customize text, images, and fillable areas, whiteout unnecessary details, highlight the important ones, and comment on your updates.
Get your paperwork completed. Send the sample to other individuals via email, generate a link for faster document sharing, export the template to the cloud, or save it on your device in the current version or with Audit Trail included.

Discover all the advantages of our editor right now!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

What is the meaning of Subaward?

A subaward is a portion of the grant award passed down from the primary recipient (the grantee) to a secondary recipient (the subrecipient). This transfer of funds comes with specific conditions and responsibilities.

What is an example of a subaward?

An example of a subaward would be a territory being awarded federal funds from a Department of Justice mandatory grant to increase housing assistance for victims. The territory passes through the funds in a competitive process so that local housing agencies with the most innovative and promising ideas are funded.

What is FDP subaward?

The FDP Subaward templates were designed to expedite review among FDP member institutions under federal assistance awards (i.e., grants and cooperative agreements) supporting a public purpose.

What is the Subaward Amendment?

Amendments to the subaward, such as time extensions, rebudgeting or fund changes are accomplished by an amendment to the subaward. Some changes, such as scope of work or PI may require sponsor approval before an amendment can be issued.

What is the difference between a grantee and a subrecipient?

A subaward allows a subrecipient to carry out a portion of the work required by a federal award. Under a subaward, the award recipient transfers its responsibility to perform part of the project to another party. In contrast, a contract is designed to provide goods or services for the recip- ients own use.