The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: 2025

Get Form
The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Preview on Page 1

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online
Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.
02. Sign it in a few clicks
Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.
03. Share your form with others
Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

The easiest way to edit The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: in PDF format online

Form edit decoration
9.5
Ease of Setup
DocHub User Ratings on G2
9.0
Ease of Use
DocHub User Ratings on G2

Working on paperwork with our feature-rich and user-friendly PDF editor is straightforward. Follow the instructions below to complete The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: online easily and quickly:

  1. Sign in to your account. Sign up with your email and password or register a free account to try the product before choosing the subscription.
  2. Upload a form. Drag and drop the file from your device or import it from other services, like Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, or an external link.
  3. Edit The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology:. Effortlessly add and underline text, insert pictures, checkmarks, and symbols, drop new fillable areas, and rearrange or delete pages from your paperwork.
  4. Get the The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: accomplished. Download your adjusted document, export it to the cloud, print it from the editor, or share it with other participants via a Shareable link or as an email attachment.

Benefit from DocHub, one of the most easy-to-use editors to quickly manage your paperwork online!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.
Contact us
It is important to understand the differences between reliability and validity. Validity will tell you how good a test is for a particular situation; reliability will tell you how trustworthy a score on that test will be. You cannot draw valid conclusions from a test score unless you are sure that the test is reliable.
For example, if you ask every applicant for the project management position the same interview question, and the right answer always yields similar, positive results, such as hiring a successful employee every time, the question would be considered reliable.
To be considered good to use, a selection method needs to be both reliable and valid. Reliability refers to whether a selection method is consistent for instance, if five people are interviewing a candidate using the same questions, would they rate the candidate similarly? If so, thats a reliable interview.
From the point of view of practical value, the most important property of a personnel assessment method is predictive validity: the ability to predict future job performance, job- related learning (such as amount learned in training and development programs), and other criteria.
So while validity tells you how good a test is for a particular situation, reliability tells you how trustworthy the score or the measurement is. Think of it this way: If you measure the length of your dining room table at 72 inches, it should be 72 inches the next time you measure it.
be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

People also ask

Validity refers to how well a test or interview measures what it is supposed to measure, while reliability refers to how consistent and accurate a test or interview is.
Generally, utility of a selection method is higher when it results in a higher base rate of success for a job. Base rates of success increase when a higher-validity predictor is used and when lower selection ratios are used.

Related links