Home
Forms Library
Oral Argument Requested July 29, 2004 No 04-0409 IN THE - supreme courts state tx

Get the up-to-date Oral Argument Requested July 29, 2004 No 04-0409 IN THE - supreme courts state tx-2025 now

Oral Argument Requested July 29, 2004 No 04-0409 IN THE - supreme courts state tx Preview on Page 1

Show details

4 out of 5

27 votes

The document is a Petition for Review submitted to the Supreme Court of Texas by Michael T. Willis, Francie Willis, Urban Retreat of Houston, Inc., and Willis Hite Enterprises, Inc. against Dan Donnelly. The case revolves around a breach of contract and fiduciary duty claims stemming from a Letter Agreement that promised Donnelly shareholder status in the corporations. The Court of Appeals had affirmed damages awarded to Donnelly while creating new fiduciary duties for majority shareholders towards non-shareholders based on contractual promises. The petition argues that this expansion of fiduciary duty law undermines corporate protections and improperly holds controlling shareholders liable for corporate breaches without direct findings against them.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

The best way to edit Oral Argument Requested July 29, 2004 No 04-0409 IN THE - supreme courts state tx in PDF format online

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Handling paperwork with our comprehensive and intuitive PDF editor is easy. Make the steps below to fill out Oral Argument Requested July 29, 2004 No 04-0409 IN THE - supreme courts state tx online quickly and easily:

Sign in to your account. Sign up with your email and password or register a free account to try the service before upgrading the subscription.
Import a document. Drag and drop the file from your device or add it from other services, like Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, or an external link.
Edit Oral Argument Requested July 29, 2004 No 04-0409 IN THE - supreme courts state tx. Easily add and underline text, insert images, checkmarks, and symbols, drop new fillable fields, and rearrange or delete pages from your paperwork.
Get the Oral Argument Requested July 29, 2004 No 04-0409 IN THE - supreme courts state tx accomplished. Download your adjusted document, export it to the cloud, print it from the editor, or share it with other participants via a Shareable link or as an email attachment.

Benefit from DocHub, the most straightforward editor to promptly handle your documentation online!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

Why do the Justices interrupt attorneys during oral arguments?

It is normal for a justice to interrupt an attorney mid-sentence to ask a question. This format can be surprising if you have not seen an oral argument. It is not meant to be disrespectful but rather allows the justices to make the most of their time with the attorney.

Can I hear Supreme Court oral arguments?

Beginning with the October Term 2010, the audio recordings of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States are available free to the public on the Courts website, .supremecourt.gov.

What do the judges do during oral arguments?

The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important.

What is a Court oral argument?

An oral argument is a presentation of a case before a court by spoken word. Lawyers or parties representing each side in a dispute have 30 minutes to make their case and answer questions from Supreme Court justices or Intermediate Appellate Court judges.

What is the time limit for an oral argument before the Supreme Court?

During oral arguments, each side has approximately 30 minutes to present its case, however, attorneys are not required to use the entire time. The petitioner argues first, then the respondent.

What is the oral argument of appeals?

Oral argument is an opportunity for the parties to make sure the court understands the most important issues of an appeal. The parties can explain the arguments in their briefs and answer questions from the justices.

Why would an attorney waive the right to make oral argument?

An attorney might waive the right to make an oral argument for several reasons: Written Briefs are Sufficient: The attorney may believe that the written briefs submitted provide a clear and compelling argument, making oral presentation unnecessary.

Why did Court of Appeals deny oral argument?

Oral argument will be allowed unless: (i) the appeal is frivolous; or (ii) the dispositive issue or set of issues has been recently authoritatively decided; or (iii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral

Get the up-to-date Oral Argument Requested July 29, 2004 No 04-0409 IN THE - supreme courts state tx-2025 now

Here's how it works