Home
Forms Library
State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court

State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court 2025

State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court Preview on Page 1

Show details

4.6 out of 5

65 votes

The document is a court decision regarding Robert L. Bates' mandamus action against Judge Charles Schneider, seeking a revised sentencing entry due to the original judge's failure to sign it. The court dismissed Bates' case because he did not comply with the statutory requirements for filing as an inmate, specifically R.C. 2969.25(C), which mandates certain affidavits for fee waivers. The magistrate's recommendation to dismiss was upheld after Bates' objections were overruled.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to rapidly redact State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court online

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Dochub is a perfect editor for updating your forms online. Adhere to this simple instruction to redact State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court in PDF format online free of charge:

Register and log in. Register for a free account, set a secure password, and go through email verification to start managing your templates.
Upload a document. Click on New Document and choose the form importing option: upload State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court from your device, the cloud, or a protected URL.
Make changes to the template. Utilize the top and left panel tools to edit State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court. Insert and customize text, pictures, and fillable areas, whiteout unnecessary details, highlight the important ones, and comment on your updates.
Get your paperwork completed. Send the sample to other parties via email, generate a link for faster document sharing, export the template to the cloud, or save it on your device in the current version or with Audit Trail included.

Discover all the advantages of our editor today!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

What was the court decision in Riley v. California?

Outcome. The Supreme Court held in a unanimous decision by Chief Justice Roberts, that police generally require a warrant in order to search cell phones, even when it occurs during an otherwise lawful arrest.

Is Riley v. California still good law?

The Riley v. California decision remains a cornerstone of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, symbolizing the balance between effective law enforcement and the protection of individual constitutional rights.

What is the Riley case about?

Riley argues that allowing police officers to search through data on his cell phone without a warrant is an unacceptable intrusion on personal privacy. California argues that police officers need to be able to confiscate cell phones without first obtaining a warrant for safety reasons and to prevent destruction of

What was the Supreme Court decision in the United States v Texas case?

54 decision for Kent In a 5-4 decision, Justice Abe Fortas wrote for the majority. The Supreme Court determined there was not a sufficient investigation prior to the juvenile court waiver of jurisdiction. Kent did not receive a hearing, access to counsel, or access to his record prior to the waiver.

What did the Supreme Court hold in the 2014 case of Riley v California?

Holding: Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States.

Related forms

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

What was the Schneider Supreme Court case?

Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964), was a 53 United States Supreme Court case that invalidated a law that stripped naturalized Americans of their citizenship as a result of extended or permanent residence abroad.

What did the Supreme Court hold in the 2014 case of Riley v. California quizlet?

In the 1985 case New Jersey v. T.L.O., the Supreme Court held that instead of probably cause, reasonable suspicion is required for searches in schools. In the 2014 case Riley v. California, the Supreme Court held that warrants are required to search smartphones seized on arrest.

State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court 2025

Here's how it works

How to rapidly redact State ex rel Bates v Schneider - Supreme Court online

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Got questions?

What was the court decision in Riley v. California?

Is Riley v. California still good law?

What is the Riley case about?

What was the Supreme Court decision in the United States v Texas case?

What did the Supreme Court hold in the 2014 case of Riley v California?

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

People also ask

What was the Schneider Supreme Court case?

What did the Supreme Court hold in the 2014 case of Riley v. California quizlet?

Related links

Try more PDF tools