Long-Arm Statutes: A Fifty-State Survey - kansasjudicialcouncil 2025

Get Form
Long-Arm Statutes: A Fifty-State Survey - kansasjudicialcouncil Preview on Page 1

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online
Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.
02. Sign it in a few clicks
Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.
03. Share your form with others
Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out Long-Arm Statutes: A Fifty-State Survey - kansasjudicialcouncil with our platform

Form edit decoration
9.5
Ease of Setup
DocHub User Ratings on G2
9.0
Ease of Use
DocHub User Ratings on G2
  1. Click ‘Get Form’ to open it in the editor.
  2. Begin by filling in the 'Plaintiff' and 'Defendant' sections with the appropriate names. Ensure accuracy as this information is crucial for court records.
  3. Enter the 'Case No.' in the designated field, which helps identify your case within the court system.
  4. In the 'Address' section, provide the defendant's complete address to ensure proper notification of the hearing.
  5. Fill in the date and time of the scheduled hearing. This is essential for both parties to prepare adequately.
  6. Complete the 'Return of Service' section by certifying how you served notice to the defendant, including dates and times.
  7. Finally, review all entries for accuracy before saving or printing your document for submission.

Start using our platform today to streamline your document editing and ensure a smooth process!

See more Long-Arm Statutes: A Fifty-State Survey - kansasjudicialcouncil versions

We've got more versions of the Long-Arm Statutes: A Fifty-State Survey - kansasjudicialcouncil form. Select the right Long-Arm Statutes: A Fifty-State Survey - kansasjudicialcouncil version from the list and start editing it straight away!
Versions Form popularity Fillable & printable
2018 4.5 Satisfied (36 Votes)
2018 4.9 Satisfied (24 Votes)
2015 4 Satisfied (26 Votes)
2014 4 Satisfied (34 Votes)
2012 4.8 Satisfied (120 Votes)
2002 4.4 Satisfied (123 Votes)
be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.
Contact us
Obtaining Personal Jurisdiction Typically for a court to have personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the plaintiff needs to serve the defendant in the state in which the court sits, and the defendant needs to voluntarily appear in court .
A long-arm statute is a statute that allows for a court to obtain personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant on the basis of certain acts committed by an out-of-state defendant, provided that the defendant has a sufficient connection with the state.
Californias long arm (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 410.10) provides more concisely: A court of this state may exercise jurisdiction on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States.
THE LONG-ARM STATUTE: WYOMING EXPANDS JURISDICTION OF THE STATE COURTS OVER NON-RESIDENTS The traditional common law basis of jurisdiction over the person is personal service on the defendant while he is present within the territorial limits of the state in which the court sits.
This sounds confusing, but it really boils down to this: long arm statute allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants, provided that the government can prove that the defendant has at least minimum contacts in the forum state.

People also ask

The Kansas long arm statute, K.S.A. 60-308(b), defines when Kansas exercises specific jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant. General jurisdiction refers to the power of a state to adjudicate any cause of action involving a particular defendant, regardless of where the cause of action arose.
Long arm statute refers to the jurisdiction a court has over out-of-state defendant corporations. In order for a court to establish jurisdiction, it is necessary that the defendant corporation has a business relationship in a consistent and systematic way in the forum state. This is known as minimum contact.
There are generally 5 factors reviewed when looking at reasonableness: judicial efficiency, defendants burden, plaintiffs interest, the forum states interest and the shared states interest.

Related links