Get the up-to-date Application - Enhancing Peer Review at NIH - enhancing-peer-review nih 2024 now

Get Form
Application - Enhancing Peer Review at NIH - enhancing-peer-review nih Preview on Page 1

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online
01. Edit your form online
Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.
02. Sign it in a few clicks
02. Sign it in a few clicks
Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.
03. Share your form with others
03. Share your form with others
Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to modify Application - Enhancing Peer Review at NIH - enhancing-peer-review nih online

Form edit decoration
9.5
Ease of Setup
DocHub User Ratings on G2
9.0
Ease of Use
DocHub User Ratings on G2

With DocHub, making adjustments to your paperwork requires just a few simple clicks. Make these fast steps to modify the PDF Application - Enhancing Peer Review at NIH - enhancing-peer-review nih online for free:

  1. Sign up and log in to your account. Sign in to the editor with your credentials or click on Create free account to examine the tool’s capabilities.
  2. Add the Application - Enhancing Peer Review at NIH - enhancing-peer-review nih for editing. Click the New Document button above, then drag and drop the file to the upload area, import it from the cloud, or via a link.
  3. Alter your file. Make any adjustments required: insert text and pictures to your Application - Enhancing Peer Review at NIH - enhancing-peer-review nih, highlight details that matter, erase sections of content and replace them with new ones, and insert symbols, checkmarks, and areas for filling out.
  4. Complete redacting the template. Save the updated document on your device, export it to the cloud, print it right from the editor, or share it with all the parties involved.

Our editor is very easy to use and effective. Try it out now!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.
Contact us
The peer review process starts once you have submitted your paper to a journal. After submission, your paper will be sent for assessment by independent experts in your field. The reviewers are asked to judge the validity, significance, and originality of your work.
Applications are evaluated based on five scored criteria: Significance, Investigators, Innovation, Approach, and Environment (see complete definitions).
The criteria include questions on research significance, methods, data and its availability, appropriate referencing, presentation, and key points. A review will begin with these four specific questions. We also ask reviewers to include a full formal review, which is explained more below.
Scoring. The NIH utilizes a 9-point rating scale (1 = exceptional; 9 = poor) for all applications; the same scale is used for overall impact scores and for criterion scores (Scoring Guidance).
A raw score of 1 is the best possible, 9 is the worst. Taking the review criteria into account, here are the steps the review committee takes to arrive at an overall impact score. Before the meeting, your assigned reviewers score each criterion and give your application a preliminary overall impact score.
be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

People also ask

The first level of review (initial peer review) is an assessment of scientific and technical merit and is conducted by a Scientific Review Group (SRG) composed primarily of non-federal scientists who have expertise in relevant scientific disciplines and current research areas.
The NIH scoring system uses a 9-point rating scale from 1 = Exceptional to 9 = Poor for the overall impact/priority score as well as the individual review criteria. Ratings are provided only in whole numbers, not decimals.
As many of you may know, the NIH has five main review criteria: Significance, Innovation, Approach, Investigator and Environment.

Related links