Home
Forms Library
Implementation of Application Changes - enhancing-peer-review nih

Get the up-to-date Implementation of Application Changes - enhancing-peer-review nih 2025 now

Implementation of Application Changes - enhancing-peer-review nih Preview on Page 1

Show details

4.8 out of 5

54 votes

The document is a transcript of a video by Dr. Alan Willard discussing upcoming changes to the NIH peer review system and application processes effective from January 25, 2010. It outlines enhancements aimed at improving the alignment between application content and review criteria, reducing applicant burden, and increasing transparency in the review process. Key changes include restructuring application forms, shorter page limits for research plans, and new instructions for biographical sketches and resource descriptions. The document emphasizes the importance of familiarizing oneself with these changes to ensure successful application submissions.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

The best way to edit Implementation of Application Changes - enhancing-peer-review nih in PDF format online

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Working on documents with our comprehensive and intuitive PDF editor is easy. Follow the instructions below to fill out Implementation of Application Changes - enhancing-peer-review nih online quickly and easily:

Sign in to your account. Log in with your email and password or register a free account to try the service prior to choosing the subscription.
Upload a form. Drag and drop the file from your device or import it from other services, like Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, or an external link.
Edit Implementation of Application Changes - enhancing-peer-review nih. Effortlessly add and highlight text, insert images, checkmarks, and symbols, drop new fillable areas, and rearrange or delete pages from your document.
Get the Implementation of Application Changes - enhancing-peer-review nih accomplished. Download your updated document, export it to the cloud, print it from the editor, or share it with others via a Shareable link or as an email attachment.

Benefit from DocHub, the most straightforward editor to rapidly manage your documentation online!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

What is an NIH revision?

A renewal application competes with all other applications and must be fully developed as though the applicant is applying for the first time. Revision (Type 3). A request for an increase in support in a current budget period for expansion of the projects approved scope or research protocol.

What is the peer review process for NIH?

The NIH peer review process forms the cornerstone of the NIH extramural research program. Through this process, NIH seeks to ensure that applications for funding receive fair, independent, expert, and timely scientific reviewsfree from inappropriate influencesso that NIH can fund the most promising research.

What is the 37 month rule for NIH?

NIH policy allows a 37 month window for one resubmission (A1) following the submission of a new, renewal, or revision application (A0 application). The initial submission of a new, renewal or revision application constitutes the starting point for the 37 month policy.

What is an NIH revision application?

Revision (Type 3). A request for an increase in support in a current budget period for expansion of the projects approved scope or research protocol. The request may specify budgetary changes required for the remainder of the project period as well as for the current budget period.

What is the success rate of R01 resubmission?

Only approximately 15% of R01 and R01-equivalent grants are accepted for funding on the initial submission. However, this statistic increases to 30% if the appropriate steps are taken to revise and resubmit the grant.

What is the simplified framework for NIH peer review?

The Simplified Framework for NIH Peer Review Criteria retains the five regulatory criteria (Significance, Investigators, Innovation, Approach, Environment) but reorganizes them into three factors two receive numerical criterion scores and one is evaluated for sufficiency.

What qualifies as an NIH resubmission?

A resubmission is an unfunded application that has been modified following initial review and resubmitted for consideration. A resubmission application can follow a competing new, renewal, or revision application (A0) that was not selected for funding (including applications not discussed in review).

What is an example of rebudgeting NIH?

Example: If the award budget for total costs is $200,000, any rebudgeting that would result in an increase or decrease of more than $50,000 in a budget category is considered significant rebudgeting. Change in Scope A change in scope is an activity that requires both ISMMS and NIH prior approval.

Get the up-to-date Implementation of Application Changes - enhancing-peer-review nih 2025 now

Here's how it works