Home
Forms Library
Motion to Prohibit Electronic and Photographic Coverage

Motion to Prohibit Electronic and Photographic Coverage 2025

Motion to Prohibit Electronic and Photographic Coverage Preview on Page 1

See details

4.2 out of 5

53 votes

The document is a legal motion filed in court by the plaintiff, seeking to prohibit electronic and photographic coverage of a murder trial. The motion argues that such coverage would infringe upon the defendant's right to a fair trial due to extensive prejudicial publicity surrounding the case, especially since the District Attorney intends to seek the death penalty. It cites various Supreme Court rulings emphasizing the need for a fair trial and due process, asserting that media coverage could compromise the integrity of the proceedings and the impartiality of jurors. The motion requests a hearing before any media coverage is authorized.

Here's how it works

01. Edit your form online

Type text, add images, blackout confidential details, add comments, highlights and more.

02. Sign it in a few clicks

Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad.

03. Share your form with others

Send it via email, link, or fax. You can also download it, export it or print it out.

How to use or fill out Motion to Prohibit Electronic and Photographic Coverage with our platform

Ease of Setup

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Ease of Use

DocHub User Ratings on G2

Click ‘Get Form’ to open the Motion to Prohibit Electronic and Photographic Coverage in the editor.
Begin by filling in the court name and county at the top of the form. This identifies where your motion is being filed.
Next, enter the names of the plaintiff and defendant in the designated fields. Ensure accuracy as this information is crucial for legal proceedings.
In the body of the motion, clearly state your reasons for prohibiting electronic and photographic coverage. Reference any relevant constitutional articles or amendments that support your request.
Provide detailed arguments regarding how media coverage could impact the fairness of the trial, citing precedents if applicable.
Conclude with a formal request for a hearing on this matter, ensuring you sign and date the document appropriately before submission.

Start using our platform today to streamline your document editing process for free!

be ready to get more

Complete this form in 5 minutes or less

Get form

Got questions?

We have answers to the most popular questions from our customers. If you can't find an answer to your question, please contact us.

Why are photos not allowed in court?

If police officers had no probable cause to search for or seize the evidence, it may be inadmissible. Third-party hearsay (in most cases) and coerced confessions are also inadmissible in criminal trials in California.

Why are cameras not allowed in the US Supreme court?

Over the years, justices have given many reasons for banning cameras. Among them: the Court needs to preserve its tradition; people will not understand the function of oral arguments; the media will use embarrassing sound bites; and cameras will encourage showboating.

What could cause photographs to be inadmissible in court?

Does the photo accurately portray its subject? Authenticating photo or video evidence raises the issue of whether it fairly and accurately depicts the subject. For example, does the photo represent the scene as it appeared on the date of the accident. Authentication problems can pose barriers.

What is the rule 1.150 of the California Rules of court?

The judge in his or her discretion may permit, refuse, limit, or terminate media coverage. This rule does not otherwise limit or restrict the right of the media to cover and report court proceedings. The media may request an order on Media Request to Photograph, Record, or Broadcast (form MC-500).

Try more PDF tools