When you work with different document types like Litigation Agreement, you understand how significant precision and attention to detail are. This document type has its specific format, so it is crucial to save it with the formatting undamaged. For this reason, dealing with this sort of documents might be a challenge for conventional text editing software: a single incorrect action might mess up the format and take extra time to bring it back to normal.
If you want to shade light in Litigation Agreement without any confusion, DocHub is a perfect tool for this kind of duties. Our online editing platform simplifies the process for any action you may need to do with Litigation Agreement. The streamlined interface is suitable for any user, no matter if that individual is used to dealing with this kind of software or has only opened it for the first time. Access all modifying tools you need easily and save your time on daily editing activities. You just need a DocHub account.
Discover how easy papers editing can be regardless of the document type on your hands. Access all essential modifying features and enjoy streamlining your work on paperwork. Sign up your free account now and see immediate improvements in your editing experience.
look at the question which was being referred at paragraph 58 of nn jobot and then the Lords I had shown your Lordships some portions of the Stamp Act various provisions of the Stamp Act had been shown to my lords and some judgments under the Stamp Act to show me Lord that its the instrument and not the document which is the subject matter of the stamp Duty yeah and that it is really a fiscal matter and malot the existence and validity of the transaction or the agreement is not put in doubt if a document or instrument is not stamped and ultimately will not I had also submitted that in the in view of the interpretation that I was seeking uh to not Advance there will really be no Revenue loss because it is the arbitrator who will protect the interest of the revenue as he can a lot under 33 and 35. have you looked up the decisions as the 1940 act yes Ill come to that one or there is only one judgment um which talks of stamp Duty theres a 21 19 40th 1940 actually 21 calculate Ill come