Dealing with documents implies making small modifications to them everyday. Sometimes, the job runs nearly automatically, especially when it is part of your everyday routine. However, in some cases, working with an unusual document like a Collateral Agreement may take valuable working time just to carry out the research. To make sure that every operation with your documents is easy and swift, you need to find an optimal modifying tool for such tasks.
With DocHub, you are able to learn how it works without spending time to figure everything out. Your tools are laid out before your eyes and are easy to access. This online tool will not need any specific background - education or expertise - from its users. It is ready for work even when you are not familiar with software typically used to produce Collateral Agreement. Quickly make, modify, and send out documents, whether you work with them every day or are opening a brand new document type for the first time. It takes minutes to find a way to work with Collateral Agreement.
With DocHub, there is no need to study different document kinds to figure out how to modify them. Have the essential tools for modifying documents on hand to improve your document management.
This week, Ive been looking at the case of Coleman v Mundell, which was handed down at the end of last month. The case was a dispute about an oral contract. The claimant, Mr C sought specific performance of the contract, which is an order compelling a party to comply with their contractual obligations. It is an equitable remedy and so it is only available at the courts discretion. The facts of this case may be summarised as follows. Mr C, the claimant, had a company which was suffering financial difficulties and he wanted to secure a cash injection into his business. He owned shares in a Spanish entity. The defendant Mr M was Mr Cs friend and also a businessman. Mr C and Mr M had a conversation on the 30th of September 2016. Mr C and Mr M each recalled that conversation differently. At trial, Mr C said that Mr M agreed to make an interest-free loan of 250,000 and that the loan would be secured on Mr Cs shares. Mr M recalled that Mr C had said that