DocHub allows you to set size in Collateral Agreement swiftly and conveniently. Whether your form is PDF or any other format, you can easily alter it using DocHub's easy-to-use interface and robust editing capabilities. With online editing, you can change your Collateral Agreement without the need of downloading or setting up any software.
DocHub's drag and drop editor makes customizing your Collateral Agreement straightforward and efficient. We safely store all your edited papers in the cloud, letting you access them from anywhere, whenever you need. On top of that, it's straightforward to share your papers with parties who need to go over them or create an eSignature. And our deep integrations with Google products help you transfer, export and alter and sign papers directly from Google applications, all within a single, user-friendly platform. In addition, you can easily transform your edited Collateral Agreement into a template for repeated use.
All executed papers are safely stored in your DocHub account, are effortlessly handled and moved to other folders.
DocHub simplifies the process of completing form workflows from day one!
This week, Ive been looking at the case of Coleman v Mundell, which was handed down at the end of last month. The case was a dispute about an oral contract. The claimant, Mr C sought specific performance of the contract, which is an order compelling a party to comply with their contractual obligations. It is an equitable remedy and so it is only available at the courts discretion. The facts of this case may be summarised as follows. Mr C, the claimant, had a company which was suffering financial difficulties and he wanted to secure a cash injection into his business. He owned shares in a Spanish entity. The defendant Mr M was Mr Cs friend and also a businessman. Mr C and Mr M had a conversation on the 30th of September 2016. Mr C and Mr M each recalled that conversation differently. At trial, Mr C said that Mr M agreed to make an interest-free loan of 250,000 and that the loan would be secured on Mr Cs shares. Mr M recalled that Mr C had said that M
