Document-centered workflows can consume a lot of your time and energy, no matter if you do them regularly or only from time to time. It doesn’t have to be. The truth is, it’s so easy to inject your workflows with additional productivity and structure if you engage the right solution - DocHub. Sophisticated enough to tackle any document-related task, our software lets you modify text, pictures, comments, collaborate on documents with other parties, create fillable forms from scratch or web templates, and electronically sign them. We even protect your data with industry-leading security and data protection certifications.
You can access DocHub editor from any place or system. Enjoy spending more time on creative and strategic tasks, and forget about tedious editing. Give DocHub a try today and watch your appeal workflow transform!
Mr TR yes my lady I believe we paused at um my Lord question in regards to paragraph 66 and the distinction between why theres automatic liability on the part of the hco but not accreditor under the the REM and the construction of paragraph 66 I think we were going and come on to both um you are absolutely right that was the precise point at which we stopped um and I would find it helpful if you wouldnt mind if you could just give us a preview of your answer to the question before we delve into bone because then Ill know what to be looking for right so in terms of bone the argument is that the case before your Lordships is a different kettle of fish that way in terms of the Creditor um in bone the and I take you to the relevant section of the moment um the argument why theres automatic liability or and the reasoning towards it was because of where the war the RIT where the enforced power under the RIT was directed to in that case it was directed to the H CEO and not to the enforcem