DocHub delivers everything you need to easily modify, generate and handle and safely store your Collateral Agreement and any other papers online within a single solution. With DocHub, you can stay away from document management's time-consuming and resource-intense operations. By reducing the need for printing and scanning, our environmentally-friendly solution saves you time and decreases your paper usage.
As soon as you’ve registered a DocHub account, you can start editing and sharing your Collateral Agreement in mere minutes with no prior experience needed. Discover various pro editing features to link state in Collateral Agreement. Store your edited Collateral Agreement to your account in the cloud, or send it to users utilizing email, dirrect link, or fax. DocHub allows you to convert your document to other document types without the need of toggling between programs.
You can now link state in Collateral Agreement in your DocHub account whenever you need and anywhere. Your documents are all stored in one place, where you can modify and handle them quickly and effortlessly online. Try it now!
This week, Ive been looking at the case of Coleman v Mundell, which was handed down at the end of last month. The case was a dispute about an oral contract. The claimant, Mr C sought specific performance of the contract, which is an order compelling a party to comply with their contractual obligations. It is an equitable remedy and so it is only available at the courts discretion. The facts of this case may be summarised as follows. Mr C, the claimant, had a company which was suffering financial difficulties and he wanted to secure a cash injection into his business. He owned shares in a Spanish entity. The defendant Mr M was Mr Cs friend and also a businessman. Mr C and Mr M had a conversation on the 30th of September 2016. Mr C and Mr M each recalled that conversation differently. At trial, Mr C said that Mr M agreed to make an interest-free loan of 250,000 and that the loan would be secured on Mr Cs shares. Mr M recalled that Mr C had said that M