Document-centered workflows can consume a lot of your time and energy, no matter if you do them routinely or only occasionally. It doesn’t have to be. The truth is, it’s so easy to inject your workflows with extra productivity and structure if you engage the right solution - DocHub. Advanced enough to handle any document-related task, our platform lets you alter text, images, notes, collaborate on documents with other users, generate fillable forms from scratch or web templates, and digitally sign them. We even protect your information with industry-leading security and data protection certifications.
You can access DocHub instruments from any location or system. Enjoy spending more time on creative and strategic tasks, and forget about tedious editing. Give DocHub a try today and see your Collateral Agreement workflow transform!
This week, Ive been looking at the case of Coleman v Mundell, which was handed down at the end of last month. The case was a dispute about an oral contract. The claimant, Mr C sought specific performance of the contract, which is an order compelling a party to comply with their contractual obligations. It is an equitable remedy and so it is only available at the courts discretion. The facts of this case may be summarised as follows. Mr C, the claimant, had a company which was suffering financial difficulties and he wanted to secure a cash injection into his business. He owned shares in a Spanish entity. The defendant Mr M was Mr Cs friend and also a businessman. Mr C and Mr M had a conversation on the 30th of September 2016. Mr C and Mr M each recalled that conversation differently. At trial, Mr C said that Mr M agreed to make an interest-free loan of 250,000 and that the loan would be secured on Mr Cs shares. Mr M recalled that Mr C had said that M
