When you work with diverse document types like Collateral Agreement, you are aware how significant accuracy and attention to detail are. This document type has its specific structure, so it is crucial to save it with the formatting intact. For this reason, working with this kind of paperwork might be a struggle for traditional text editing software: a single incorrect action might ruin the format and take additional time to bring it back to normal.
If you wish to join legend in Collateral Agreement without any confusion, DocHub is an ideal tool for this kind of tasks. Our online editing platform simplifies the process for any action you may need to do with Collateral Agreement. The streamlined interface design is suitable for any user, whether that individual is used to working with this kind of software or has only opened it the very first time. Access all editing tools you need easily and save your time on everyday editing activities. You just need a DocHub account.
See how effortless document editing can be regardless of the document type on your hands. Access all top-notch editing features and enjoy streamlining your work on paperwork. Register your free account now and see instant improvements in your editing experience.
This week, Ive been looking at the case of Coleman v Mundell, which was handed down at the end of last month. The case was a dispute about an oral contract. The claimant, Mr C sought specific performance of the contract, which is an order compelling a party to comply with their contractual obligations. It is an equitable remedy and so it is only available at the courts discretion. The facts of this case may be summarised as follows. Mr C, the claimant, had a company which was suffering financial difficulties and he wanted to secure a cash injection into his business. He owned shares in a Spanish entity. The defendant Mr M was Mr Cs friend and also a businessman. Mr C and Mr M had a conversation on the 30th of September 2016. Mr C and Mr M each recalled that conversation differently. At trial, Mr C said that Mr M agreed to make an interest-free loan of 250,000 and that the loan would be secured on Mr Cs shares. Mr M recalled that Mr C had said that