When you edit documents in various formats daily, the universality of your document tools matters a lot. If your instruments work for only a few of the popular formats, you may find yourself switching between software windows to join index in zip and manage other document formats. If you wish to remove the headache of document editing, go for a platform that will effortlessly handle any extension.
With DocHub, you do not need to focus on anything but actual document editing. You will not have to juggle applications to work with different formats. It can help you modify your zip as effortlessly as any other extension. Create zip documents, modify, and share them in one online editing platform that saves you time and boosts your efficiency. All you have to do is register an account at DocHub, which takes only a few minutes or so.
You will not have to become an editing multitasker with DocHub. Its functionality is enough for fast document editing, regardless of the format you need to revise. Begin with creating an account to see how effortless document management might be having a tool designed specifically to suit your needs.
hello and welcome to this quarters firebolt tech tips today were going to talk about join indexes lets jump right in so im going to look at a query this is a query thats joining the fact table to a dimension table so were going to run this query notice that were doing a where predicate on the dimension table were also grouping by that dimension table so you can tell this query is taking a fair amount of time to run which is quite unacceptable so 11.88 seconds so lets look at why that query ran that long so lets do an explain plan on it and lets take a look so the first thing you notice is the explain plan is actually doing an inner join from the fact table to the dimension table so you can tell were doing a left outer join here but because of the wear predicate firebolt is converting that to an inner join fireball always prefers outer joins compared to inner joints the other thing to note here is that we are using the aggregating index on the fact table so theres not a lo