If you edit files in different formats day-to-day, the universality of the document tools matters a lot. If your instruments work with only a few of the popular formats, you may find yourself switching between application windows to join index in AFP and manage other document formats. If you want to get rid of the headache of document editing, get a solution that can easily handle any extension.
With DocHub, you do not need to concentrate on anything short of the actual document editing. You won’t need to juggle applications to work with various formats. It can help you revise your AFP as easily as any other extension. Create AFP documents, modify, and share them in a single online editing solution that saves you time and improves your productivity. All you have to do is sign up an account at DocHub, which takes just a few minutes or so.
You won’t need to become an editing multitasker with DocHub. Its functionality is enough for speedy document editing, regardless of the format you want to revise. Begin with creating an account and see how easy document management may be having a tool designed particularly to suit your needs.
hello and welcome to this quarters firebolt tech tips today were going to talk about join indexes lets jump right in so im going to look at a query this is a query thats joining the fact table to a dimension table so were going to run this query notice that were doing a where predicate on the dimension table were also grouping by that dimension table so you can tell this query is taking a fair amount of time to run which is quite unacceptable so 11.88 seconds so lets look at why that query ran that long so lets do an explain plan on it and lets take a look so the first thing you notice is the explain plan is actually doing an inner join from the fact table to the dimension table so you can tell were doing a left outer join here but because of the wear predicate firebolt is converting that to an inner join fireball always prefers outer joins compared to inner joints the other thing to note here is that we are using the aggregating index on the fact table so theres not a lo
