The challenge to handle Collateral Agreement can consume your time and effort and overwhelm you. But no more - DocHub is here to take the effort out of editing and completing your papers. You can forget about spending hours editing, signing, and organizing papers and worrying about data security. Our solution provides industry-leading data protection procedures, so you don’t have to think twice about trusting us with your privat data.
DocHub supports various data file formats and is accessible across multiple platforms.
This week, Ive been looking at the case of Coleman v Mundell, which was handed down at the end of last month. The case was a dispute about an oral contract. The claimant, Mr C sought specific performance of the contract, which is an order compelling a party to comply with their contractual obligations. It is an equitable remedy and so it is only available at the courts discretion. The facts of this case may be summarised as follows. Mr C, the claimant, had a company which was suffering financial difficulties and he wanted to secure a cash injection into his business. He owned shares in a Spanish entity. The defendant Mr M was Mr Cs friend and also a businessman. Mr C and Mr M had a conversation on the 30th of September 2016. Mr C and Mr M each recalled that conversation differently. At trial, Mr C said that Mr M agreed to make an interest-free loan of 250,000 and that the loan would be secured on Mr Cs shares. Mr M recalled that Mr C had said that M
