Document-based workflows can consume plenty of your time, no matter if you do them routinely or only from time to time. It doesn’t have to be. In reality, it’s so easy to inject your workflows with extra productiveness and structure if you engage the right solution - DocHub. Advanced enough to handle any document-connected task, our platform lets you alter text, pictures, notes, collaborate on documents with other users, generate fillable forms from scratch or templates, and electronically sign them. We even shield your data with industry-leading security and data protection certifications.
You can access DocHub instruments from any location or device. Enjoy spending more time on creative and strategic work, and forget about tiresome editing. Give DocHub a try today and watch your Peer Review Report workflow transform!
[Music] if youve published research before youre probably already familiar with the peer-review process but in case you have in or have never thought much about why the peer-review process is set up the way it is heres a refresher each journal does things a little differently but when an author sends in a manuscript for publication it usually undergoes a quick screening to make sure its ready for review then the editor-in-chief decides whether the paper is a good fit for the journal typically the editor-in-chief is interested in whether the work fits the scope of the journal will be interesting to the journals target audience and is generally performed at a high level if it doesnt meet these criteria the manuscript may be rejected but if the manuscript seems promising its assigned to an editor with subject area expertise usually an associate editor this editor also critically evaluates the manuscript considering the scope whether the work moves the field forward and if the result
