Flaws exist in every solution for editing every file type, and even though you can find a wide variety of tools out there, not all of them will fit your specific requirements. DocHub makes it easier than ever to make and change, and deal with documents - and not just in PDF format.
Every time you need to quickly revise detail in AFP, DocHub has got you covered. You can effortlessly alter document elements including text and pictures, and structure. Personalize, organize, and encrypt paperwork, build eSignature workflows, make fillable documents for intuitive data gathering, and more. Our templates option allows you to generate templates based on documents with which you frequently work.
In addition, you can stay connected to your go-to productivity capabilities and CRM platforms while dealing with your paperwork.
One of the most remarkable things about using DocHub is the ability to handle document activities of any complexity, regardless of whether you need a fast edit or more complex editing. It includes an all-in-one document editor, website document builder, and workflow-centered capabilities. In addition, you can be sure that your documents will be legally binding and abide by all security protocols.
Cut some time off your projects with DocHub's tools that make managing paperwork straightforward.
okay so hi everybody weamp;#39;re going to look at our feedback we got for our PDR report when I was a senior in senior design for engineering so overall we were given a score of 75 out of 100 okay so c not very good we did pretty well inequality conciseness and Effectiveness N9 out of 10 introduction background motivation including this executive summary here 14 out of 15 so very good but we didnamp;#39;t do very well and the technical details so communication Effectiveness and then the model assumption 7 out of 10 or uh then sufficient discussion of results or conclusions only six out of 10 and for our design and Analysis level of details only 6 out of 10 and then the correctness and completeness of the calculation is only 5 out of 10 so our technical analysis is pretty bad pretty lacking which is ironic because weamp;#39;re Engineers project management 12 out of 15 for budget and then 16 out of 20 for schedule so this is not too bad but yeah we definitely could have improved a lo